Jason Hartman uses this Flash Back Friday episode to educate about his concept of inflation-induced debt destruction as an investment strategy. He starts with his real-life rise to wealth and an income property seminar he attended. He believes that investing in income properties with a buy and hold strategy is the most guaranteed way to wealth. He explains the power of a 30-year mortgage on single-family homes and the tax advantages of the asset. He looks at the US financial system and how it is set up for inflation. Tying this all together he presents his case for the best investment strategy for real estate investors.
This show is produced by the Hartman media company. For more information and links to all our great podcasts visit Hartman media.com.
Welcome to this week’s edition of flashback Friday, your opportunity to get some good review by listening to episodes from the past that Jason is hand picked to help you today in the present, and propel you into the future. Enjoy.
Welcome to the creating wealth show with Jason Hartman. You’re about to learn a new slant on investing some exciting techniques and fresh new approaches to the world’s most historically proven asset class that will enable you to create more wealth and freedom than you ever thought possible. Jason is a genuine self made multi millionaire who’s actually been there and done it. He’s a successful investor, lender, developer and entrepreneur who’s owned properties in 11 states had hundreds of tenants and been involved in thousands of real estate transactions. This program will help you follow in Jason’s footsteps on the road to your financial independence day. You really can do it. And now here’s your host, Jason Hartman with the complete solution for real estate investors.
Jason Hartman 1:16
Hey, welcome to the creating wealth Show. I’m Jason Hartman, your host, thank you for joining me for episode number 638 638. And it’s great to have you here today. And I have only done this on rare occasion. And that is where I was interviewed on somebody else’s show. But I kind of thought the points were pretty good. It was maybe a good review of a topic we’ve done before. And I will play it for you on this show. So that’s what we’re going to do today. Your guest is none other than yours truly Jason Hartman. And someone else interviewing me. Occasionally we do this and this is one of those times I don’t think we’ve done it in a couple hundred episodes. So we will get to that here in just a moment. But first, I will share with you something that I wrote on my Facebook page today, and it will give you cause to ponder. It’s a couple quotes from Ben Bernanke, and then one from the brilliant old Yogi Berra, the late Yogi Berra. He has such great quotes. You know, I’ve shared a couple of those on the show previously. So yeah, Yogi Berra said, when you come to a fork in the road, take it, or the one I love the most, the future ain’t what it used to be. What an awesome quote. You really got to wrap your head around that for a moment to ponder it, but it’s really good. Anyway, too, from Ben Bernanke key and one from Yogi Berra, Ben Bernanke. 2009. No one will lend at a negative interest rate. Potential creditors will simply choose to hold cash, which pays zero nominal interest, says Ben Bernanke key or former or former Federal Reserve Chair In 2009, and then he contradicts himself massively in 2015. Quote, I think negative interest rates are something the Fed will and probably should consider if the situation arises. Ben Bernanke 2015. I mean, this is unbelievable. And then Yogi Berra says, in theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is awesome quote Yogi Berra, you know, it just goes to show you the central bankers around the world. They’re frickin making this stuff up. I mean, they, they really, these are not the brilliant people the world wants to give them credit for. They’re simply human beings with their own agenda and their own self interest. And they’re making this crap up as they go along. And we realize that the only real tools In their tool belt is money creation, actually sorry, let me correct myself, currency creation, to create currency fiat currency out of thin air. Whenever the industrialized nations around the world meet, they have some big meeting in Davos, Switzerland or wherever it is, you know, Davos is only one of their big meetings or Jackson Hole, Wyoming or whatever, you know, they got their big important meetings for these self important people. They’re meeting to see what they can do to fix the world economy. And the answer, why do they need to talk about this for hours? The answer is, let’s just print more money. Let’s just create more money out of thin air. We don’t even have to print it anymore, because we can do it on a computer screen. So it’s just an absurdity wrapped in an enigma. I mean, it’s crazy. And then I posted a little picture meme, and it’s it’s good I like this one. So I’ll share that with you too. In the same Facebook thread, it says, give a man a gun, and he can rob a bank, give them at a bank, and he can rob the whole world. It’s so true, isn’t it? Oh, it’s just crazy. It’s just crazy. So we’ll see if we, if we really see a negative interest rate environment. We’ve got that in a couple places around the world. We talked about that before on prior episodes, and we shall see how it all evolves. We are living in crazy times, crazy times of financial repression, financial repression, and we as investors must align our interest with these incredible powers. You know, before I probably misspoke, as I often do, by the way, there’s my disclaimer, I often miss speak. How do you like that one? And I said, these were self important people. They’re actually not self important people. They are important people and the world has made them important. So we must align our interest with theirs. We must not fight it. We must, we can bitch about it, we can complain about it, but we must ultimately align our interests with theirs. Because we know their interest will win the day. It always does. And that’s why we engage in lots of arbitrage. As real estate investors, we get probably more arbitrage type opportunities than any other type of investor. And again, my simplistic definition of arbitrage you know, go look it up. I’m sure you’ll get a much more academic definition.
Jason Hartman 6:41
But you know, me, I think, a lot of times simple things are the best. That’s why I think a good old internet meme on social media can explain things much better than some long flippin essay. You know, if you if you have to use a lot of words. You’re probably either hiding something maybe you’re hiding the fact that you don’t understand it right? And that’s what a lot of these people do you know, the Fed comes out with a Beige Book right they got a lot of words to explain something which basically means let’s create some more money out of thin air or currency sorry, misspoke again currency not money, there’s a difference money is real currency is fake, okay currency is Fiat, always by nature by definition. So, you know, a lot of times a simple little meme can explain it well. So, what is the Jason Hartman definition of arbitrage Simply put, exploiting the differences in things, exploiting the differences of thing in things, right. So you, when you geo arbitrage, you exploit the difference in geography, right. For example, pay scales in different geographies vary greatly, and that’s why we’ve seen so many companies do offshoring and outsourcing and you know, Moving to different jurisdictions where they can arbitrage the tax Nexus where they can arbitrage the payroll or the the wage Nexus. Or they can arbitrage environmental laws where they can arbitrage the cost of real estate, or they can arbitrage all sorts of things in the sort of the Tim Ferriss movement. He and those people in that movement have got this term, they use a lot called geo arbitrage. And we can do that ourselves. I mean, I like to do that in my company. You know, I’m not too into the offshoring thing, because I haven’t had very good luck hiring people in the Philippines or India. You know, maybe it’s a cultural barrier or language barrier, I don’t know. But it just hasn’t worked for me. I’ll put it that way. So I hire North American workers to work in my companies and to do different things and provide different freelancer, contractor oriented task for us. And I try to hire people who are living In a lower cost of living market, I mean, if I’m going to hire a person who you know is going to do a website for me, or, you know, edit a podcast, and they live in New York City, or they live in Los Angeles, California, or if they live in Miami, or Boston, I know I gotta pay them a lot of money to be able to afford to live there. But I can hire a person who’s very bright, who’s every bit as capable in Phoenix, or Dallas or Austin, or Indianapolis or Atlanta or hate. Coincidentally, a lot of those are markets that we either recommend now or have recommended in the past right? linear real estate markets, where the cost of living is reasonable, the cash flow is good, the LTI the land to improvement ratio. Another term I coined, the land to improvement ratio is favorable to us. Investors using the Hartman risk evaluator to reduce our risk dramatically when we invest in those markets. I am geo arbitrage, right? Because I can pay people more than they can get working locally. But to me, it’s a bargain compared to hiring someone in a really high cost jurisdiction. So it’s a win win deal. we all win. It’s a win win deal for everybody. So arbitrage and as a real estate investor, we want to arbitrage as many things as possible. And there are all sorts of ways we do this with monetary and fiscal policy and tax policy and rent value ratios. And of course, we’ve talked about those extensively over the many, many years, and many prior episodes, but just keep that in mind. And as you listen to this interview, I think you’ll get a lot out of it. Join us in Salt Lake City, coming up fast March 12. We’ve Got a great Jason Hartman University A j h you live event there and a lot of you have registered already so thank you for that. And just make sure you join us it’s going to be an awesome event. I’m really looking forward to this event. And we have made this one a lot more challenging. So if you came when we did it the first time in August last August in San Diego, come to Salt Lake City, enjoy a little spring skiing I think you’ll have a great time there. It’s got the best snow in the world. Enjoy the natural beauty of the Salt Lake City area great city love it. They’re also learning some good stuff at Jason Hartman University. We’ve got a beautiful hotel, they’re just really a great all around setup a great room block with some low rates. We did just recently announced that so you should have received an email if you’ve already registered with the booking link to book your hotel rooms at the bargain room block rate and if that got filtered or you didn’t receive it for whatever reason, check with your investment. counselor, and they will be glad to provide you with the information. And before we get to our interview, here’s a little quick nice boxer message I got today that I wanted to share with you.
Ross Johnson 12:09
My name is Ross Johnson from Minneapolis, Minnesota. I heard about you from Ryan Daniel Moran on freedom Fastlane. I’ve been listening ever since probably about 200 episodes now. very intrigued in the Orlando market. Definitely checked into it. I’m very curious to hear what your thought is on vacation rental properties there. I’ve not heard you talk much about it. It seems like there’s a lot of upside. And I know you’re not big on a choice, but I just wanted to hear what your thoughts were on vacation rental properties in the Orlando area. Thanks, Jason. Appreciate it.
Jason Hartman 12:44
Hey, Ross, thanks for the message. Appreciate it and appreciate you listening to 200 episodes of the show. That’s great. You’ve only got about 440 of them to go.
Jason Hartman 12:55
Anyway. Yeah, I have talked a lot about vacation properties over the year. You know, in various episodes, and it’s not that this is a statement on Orlando in any way,
Jason Hartman 13:14
but rather a statement on vacation properties in general, and I’m not a fan of vacation properties, I think there’s a lot more management involved. There’s obviously a whole world of change that is occurring with Airbnb, and various sharing economy sites like that, that is changing the game quite a bit. There are huge tax implications that people don’t need to know about. And a lot of these owners that have vacation properties are going to be hit with big tax bills that they don’t even expect. And I’ve tried I have done some shows recently on the app. So you’ve probably heard those episodes and I’ve also I think one of those tax episodes is on the AIP is show. But, you know, one reason that regardless of all of this stuff that I’m not a fan of vacation properties is because they’re not a necessity. And, you know, the economy goes down the tubes. The first thing people are going to start doing is taking vacations, right? So I’m just, I’m just not a fan. I think that stable, necessity oriented housing is where it’s at. And that’s where you want to be investing. So I hope that helps. And I appreciate you listening to the show in referring your friends. Thanks again.
Ross Johnson 14:40
Hey, Jason, just wanted to say thanks for the quick reply. Though some great advice there. Also just want to say I really appreciate your show, and I’ve definitely learned a ton. I own two rental properties now that were bought in speculation and I was definitely led down the wrong path. And I’m very excited here to Being close to having enough money to get back into this, but with a whole new mindset, so I really contribute that strictly to you in your show and all of your guests, and I just I really, really appreciate it. And now I just want to let you know that Thanks, Jason, have a great day.
Jason Hartman 15:14
But that’s the thing. See, I hope everybody will listen to my show before they go buying real estate on a speculative basis. commandment number five, thou shalt maintain. Well, that’s commandment number three. What am I thinking? commandment number five, Thou shalt not gamble. Do not buy real estate on speculation. Buy it because it makes sense the day you buy it by cash flow, income producing real estate, it’s the only kind to buy. So definitely stick with that and you’ll have a good experience. That’s the thing to do. So yeah, I know a lot of people have been led down the wrong path by many different promoters out there. The other thing that I did not address in that voxer chat there. By the way, sorry about that. Sound quality, I’ll try to only respond when I have better sound quality in the future. But the other thing is, I don’t like condos as you know, and he did mention that. So, again, avoid condos get yourself single family homes, or get yourself apartment buildings but not condos. Unless you control the homeowners association, which you’re probably not going to do. So. Forget about condos and forget about vacation properties and forget about high priced speculative properties, income producing real estate, the non sexy stuff with good land to improvement or LTI ratios. That’s the thing to do. Remember, you’re listening to flashback Friday. Our new episodes are published every Monday and Wednesday. Let’s listen to the interview and hear more.
Well, Hey Jason, welcome to the show.
Jason Hartman 16:55
Thanks, Brian. It’s great to be here on investor in the family. Love the name by the way.
Hey, I appreciate that. It’s something we’re definitely excited about and also excited to have you here with us because a lot of our focus so far on this podcast has been on equities and we’ll continue to primarily be on equities. But real estate investing obviously is your wheelhouse and I would love to use this opportunity with you to kind of knock those doors open for some of our listeners to get a better feel for opportunities in real estate and how to make maybe make some first steps and kind of dipping their toes in the water. But before we do that, I would love to get or have you just introduce yourself to the audience kind of give you a background as an investor as well.
Jason Hartman 17:38
Yeah, absolutely. Thank you. So first of all, today I want to share some truly new thinking when it comes to investing in income property. Okay, stuff that your listeners have not heard before. You know, there’s there’s no shortage of hokey real estate gurus out there that promise you know, the world and, and and fast fortunes and so forth. I want to talk about the prudent tried and true approach to long term investing and some monetary policy issues and how we can align our interest as investors with the most powerful forces in the world, governments and central banks, okay. your listeners will hear some truly new ideas that they have not heard before anywhere else from other real estate people out there. And basically, to answer your question, the way I got started is I grew up fairly poor in Los Angeles, California. And when I was 16 years old, I kind of hit me, you know that money is a significant part of life. It’s important, you know, I didn’t think too terribly much about it before that, I guess I happen to be at home. And I was watching an infomercial. And there was a real estate guru on there. And he was talking about his book and how you can buy properties with no money, blah, blah, blah, the typical spiel that you you’ll see on TV if you can’t sleep, yeah, you know, insomnia keyword, right. Yeah. And so so I heard Talking about that I went out and I got his book. And I read three chapters of it. I was only 16 years old Mind you, and I put it down. My mom picked it up and read the rest and got really interested in the topic. Two years later, I was about to graduate from high school, I was now 18 years old. And my mom says, you know, Jason, you got me into this real estate stuff. I’ve been going to seminars, reading more books about it. And there’s one this weekend by Disneyland here in Anaheim, California. Why don’t you go and so I rounded up nine of my buddies from high school and I, I got them all to go to the, the seminar with me, you know, because we can’t do anything alone at that age. Right. And so we all show up on Friday evening, and the first speaker is talking about something called points. And I didn’t know what points were, and you know, they’re prepaid interest on a loan, I now know that and one point is 1% of the loan amount, right. And so, I remember I discovered Earl Nightingale Denis waitley Zig Ziglar. Jim Rohn about a year before that when I was 17 totally changed my life. I remember Earl Nightingale saying, you know that whenever you want to learn something new, you should just Humble yourself and he gave the example of real estate actually he said, if you want to get rich in real estate, learn the business first. So by the end of the seminar, I was just hooked. I was totally fascinated. I I stayed all through the weekend through Sunday afternoon, I saw all the speakers. All of my friends had gone off to the beach and boogie boarding and surfing and working on their tan. But I I stayed inside every speaker and first thing Monday, I went and I looked for Where can I enroll in real estate school. And by the time I was 19, I was in my first year of college now, I got my real estate license in hand. And it was just a couple weeks before my 20th birthday. I went to work at a cheesy century 21 office in Anaheim, California. And I started just selling real estate part time while I was going to college. And what do you know, I actually worked on like most people in the real estate business, or at least at the time, it’s it’s matured admittedly, that industry has gotten, you know, much more professional over the years. But this was a long time ago. And so, you know, I sold like five properties, my first full month in the business, and I couldn’t believe it. I had only earned minimum wage. Before that. I started working at age 14, the minute I could work and get a work permit, and I couldn’t believe it. And one of my clients, a guy named Jim wall, he was buying investment properties from me. And I was, you know, driving them around in my little Volkswagen Jetta. And I was working with a lot of investors because that was really my interest. It was the investing side of the business. And he comes to me about six months into my career. I’m now 20 years old, and he says, you know, Jason, what are these properties I bought from you? I really don’t like it very much. Why don’t you take the listing and sell it for me find a buyer or buy another property with the proceeds? And I said, You know what, Jim, I don’t want to sell it for you. I want to buy it from you. I actually bought this little property this little one bedroom condo on Coventry lane in Huntington Beach, California, from Jim and that was my first rental property when I was 20 years old, I had what most people would consider a bad experience. My very first tenant stopped paying me rent after a couple of months I had to evict them from the property. And they left the property in bad condition. I ended up selling it to another investor who was doing a 1031 tax deferred exchange, and I actually did okay on it. And then I started buying properties. And I was selling real estate and I was going to college, I was doing all this stuff at the same time. You know, I had just made a bunch of money, both in the real estate business as an agent, serving clients, and also as an investor investing for my own account. And I just, I just fell in love with it. I think it’s the most historically proven asset class in the entire world. Unless you’re an insider. Now you can make a ton of money on Wall Street if you’re an insider, but you know, for the rest of us It’s a little harder. And so so that’s the story of how I got started. And, you know, glad to share anything or answer any questions you have.
Yeah. Well, I mean, I lots of questions. I mean, I fall in the camp of probably like many of our listeners, where, you know, I’ve attended some seminars, and I’ve read some stuff on real estate rental properties. I’ve actually been very close to purchasing one before, but I haven’t actually followed through with it. There’s obviously a lot of different reasons for that. And some of them are good, maybe some of them not. But I think a lot of my listeners probably fall in that category as well. And real estate, unlike some other investments, whether it be equities or otherwise, there is that there’s that
kind of fear risk factor that comes
into the game. And you mentioned earlier, there’s lots of Brians that can come into real estate or it’s how you mentioned how it’s important to learn the business first. I would like I would love for you to address that just people on the fence. Love the idea but just don’t know what to do next and fearful of taking that first step.
Jason Hartman 23:58
Yeah, yeah, absolutely. So first of all, one of the beauties of income property and we really should refer to it properly is income property versus real estate because real estate could mean anything, but with income property, you know, income producing rental property. It is a multi dimensional asset class. So when you look at stocks, if they’re non dividend paying, you have one source of potential profit, capital gains only. If you look at precious metals, capital gains only. If you look at raw land capital gains only, but income producing real estate income property is a multi dimensional asset class. So you have capital gains opportunity through appreciation, you have tax benefits, because it’s the most tax favored asset class in America. Taxes are the single largest expense in any of our lives. So that’s that’s huge, just on the tax angle alone. And then of course, you have income from the property and you have leverage And you have something that I want to share with your listeners, which is a concept probably nobody has really thought of. And I have a little trademark term that goes with it, I call it inflation induced debt destruction. And I’ll share a real live example that happened to 10s of millions of people over the past couple decades. And it’s this hidden wealth creator in in the real estate or income property world. And it’s, it’s, you know, you can use what I call the double inflation arbitrage, to really, really ramp up your profits. So happy to take it wherever you want. But, you know, when you when you hear about these bad experiences in real estate, look at if you own stocks and lose money, you don’t really feel the bumps in the road. Even if you make a modest return from those stocks. There may be a whole bunch of bumps in the road that you never heard about. You never noticed and you never dealt with. For example. You have so many layers, so many layers where you have to peel back this onion, you’ve got your financial advisor hopefully you’ve got a good one. And hopefully, you know, they’re not a crook, right? So you get past them, and then they put you into maybe some funds, or maybe they put you into some different companies in which you own stock. And you’re subject to all the graft and corruption of the CEO and the board of directors of the company or, or maybe the the middlemen in between the fund managers, whatever, right. And so say, all of that goes well, and everybody’s honest and upstanding. And, you know, they, they comply with gap principles and proper corporate governance and all that good stuff. Okay. So say you get past all of that, well, you know, the bumps, you don’t feel that you do feel in real estate, because you’re a direct investor in the property, right, it’s yours, you’re in control of it. So you feel the bumps if the tenant doesn’t pay you, if there’s a repair. If there’s a disaster of some sort, you’re gonna feel that and know about it. Whereas if you invest in the company and own stock in them, you know, you don’t know if the CEO is getting sued for sexual harassment. And that could really screw up the company. You don’t know if they’re on the take, you don’t know if, you know they’ve infringed on somebody’s patent, and they’re about to get sued the way Samsung did and lost several years ago to Apple, you know, they’re just you don’t know about their competitive landscape very well, you can’t you’re not there. Okay. You know, it’s just not possible to really know this stuff with with. I mean, you can be a great, very aware very well read and well, well educated investor, but you can’t know everything because it’s not your company, you know. So those are some of the differences.
Yeah, no, that’s helpful. And, of course, one of the things that I think people probably think it’s good about that is, even if I mean, I know those things are happening. You’re the worst case scenario and a stock investment is that you lose your entire investment, which would be very bad, obviously and rare. But that’s, but that’s it. But obviously, with real estate, you know, that you’ve got the debt you’re responsible for. There’s potential legal ramifications because you are the frontline person. And then you know, as the as you’ve heard, I’m sure a million times The three T’s of taxes toilets and, and tenants, you know, so I am Yeah, I love to hear. Yeah, just how you address those things.
Jason Hartman 28:07
Yeah, absolutely. I’d be glad to address those. So first of all, the vast majority of income property loans are non recourse loans. So you’re not going to you can walk away. That’s the implicit what I call nuclear option that over 10 million people did during the Great Recession. In fact, a lot of them walked away and got paid to walk away. countrywide Bank of America was literally paying people to do short sales unsolicited on their properties they would send out they probably sent millions of letters that said, we will pay you to do a cooperative short sale anywhere between 6000 and $30,000. You know, you will let you out of the loan, you’re off the hook, just sell the property and of course, they did that because of, you know, all of the dynamics to which we’re not privy, but it’s probably harp and and, you know, the various Omnibus bailouts the banks got, and all of this kind of stuff. And so, you know, they’re usually very rarely is there actually a recourse loan on a on a on a piece of housing.
And so just to be clear, when you say, when you say non recourse, that means, so if I’m, if I own an income property, you can walk and the lender can’t sue you for the difference,
Jason Hartman 29:25
right? And so basically, they would just, they would sell the property to cover the loan on some and well, they probably not cover the loan, and you know, they lose money, but it wouldn’t be your problem, you would lose your equity, your down payment. So if you put 10% down on that property, you could lose your 10%. And you could walk in as long as it’s a non recourse loan. That’s it,
but that would impact your credit, I’m assuming right?
Jason Hartman 29:47
It would impact your credit. Yes, right. Okay. Yes. But then you know, there are a plethora of places out there that can repair your credit. Sure, so short and some of them are very hokey and dishonest to you. So be careful with everything right. But But You know, some are reputable and it can be done.
Okay. Of course, obviously, it’s an extreme situation is Yeah,
Jason Hartman 30:05
absolutely. You know, hopefully you’re never going to face that, but certainly it’s an option. Okay. Yeah. So what where would you like me to go next? Do you want me to talk to you about inflation and do step destruction? Yeah,
go. Yeah, I mean, I was gonna get there eventually, we might as well do it now. Yeah.
Jason Hartman 30:20
And I’d be glad for your listeners, if you’d like to supply you with some of these written materials, some of the actual PowerPoint slides I’m referring to here, so that you could put them on your website and they could, they could actually download them and look at them. If you if you’d like me to do that. I’d be happy to because I’m going to be talking about quite a few numbers. Okay.
But let me just set this up
Jason Hartman 30:41
first, and let’s look at the more macro economic environment. Okay. I your listeners are sophisticated educated people, and they’re certainly aware as Are you as to the problem with our spendthrift government. Okay. We are in the hole in a massive Way, okay. And so, with in knowing that I’ve identified six basic ways the government can get out of its debt and deficit problem. Okay. I had Laurence Kotlikoff on my podcast a couple of times. And you know, he’s the famous economist who, who has really probably studied this subject more than any anybody, and that is the unfunded mandates and the unfunded entitlements that are hitting us over the next 1015 and 20 years. And some would call this conservatively conservatively, the 60 trillion and that’s with a T trillion not billion trillion. Okay. The $60 trillion time bomb. Laurence Kotlikoff says it’s about a 220 trillion dollar time bomb,
and this would be referring to like Social Security, pensions and things like that. They probably don’t have funding.
Jason Hartman 31:55
Yeah, absolutely. All the promises our government has made that it simply cannot Keep, okay. So there are really only six ways out of the mess that I’ve identified that I know of. Number one is to default to simply say to everybody look, sorry, you know, everybody before me, it’s all george bush’s fault, whatever. Yeah, that’s what they always that’s, that’s Obama’s favorite line, not to get too political there. But you know, all my predecessors, they overspend and we can’t keep the promise. So sorry, we just can’t give you Social Security tough. We can’t give you Medicare. We can’t give you Obamacare. We can’t give you disability. We can’t, you know, we can’t maintain the roads, we can’t pay for national defense, whatever, right. So that’s one very politically unpopular, very unlikely option. Fortunately, the United States has the reserve currency of the world, at least for now, so we can inflate our way out of the mess very nicely. Other other countries don’t have this luxury that we do. The second option is to raise taxes. And there it’s simply not possible to raise taxes enough if you literally taxed at Everybody at 100% of their income, if you said, you know, all of your income, give it to Uncle Sam, there wouldn’t be enough to pay for this problem. The problem is expanded it’s it’s too big taxes will not do it. And of course we all know as as Reagan so aptly proved that when you raise taxes, you actually suppress revenue and you suppress economic activity. You’re punishing earning potential, right. So it’s a terrible idea of raising taxes, an absolutely terrible idea. Okay, so that’s number two. Number three is we could have a yard sale, we can sell the port’s to Dubai, we can sell military equipment to Libya to Taiwan, you know, and these are all things we’ve either considered or we’ve done you know, the Bureau of Land Management sounds like
you’ve seen that Greece right now for example. Yeah,
Jason Hartman 33:45
absolutely. Greece’s, you know, thinking about maybe they’ve actually done it now. selling off islands. Spain is a disaster. Portugal is a disaster, right. The world is a disaster, basically. Right. And so at this dance of really ugly girls, the US happens to be the prettiest out of the ugly girls. Okay? Right, because it’s got some special characteristics that other countries don’t enjoy. So number four option after having a yard sale is just use the most powerful military force the world has ever known the US military to basically steal from other countries steal their resources. Certainly, you know, we were accused of doing this in Iraq. I don’t know that it’s true. But, you know, it is an option. A very famous person that is usually revered in history was just a thief with an army. His name was Napoleon. Okay. I mean, you know, he was he was a, he was a thief, okay, that had a military and he, you know, he’s a hero, right? It’s It’s odd, odd view of the world. On the positive side, we could have a great technological innovation, you know, in the areas of maybe energy, biotech, nanotechnology. You know, there’s all kinds of exciting things happening. I mean, I always say on my show, it’s an amazing time to be alive. And it really is, if the US is at the center of one of these innovations, or many of them, that could dig us out of the hole, pretty far. But the most likely thing, the sixth option is to simply inflate our way out of the problem. And that is basically debasing the currency. And paying all those promises back in cheaper dollars, as as the value of the dollar is inflated away. This is a fantastic business plan for governments. It’s a fantastic business plan for investors. And what I’m proposing is that we as investors align our interest with governments and central banks, the most powerful forces in the world, because, you know, they may be a total scam, they may be totally corrupt, and I agree that they are, but we’re not going to change it. So we better get on their side of the table because they are so powerful. Okay, so to understand and to get excited about monetary and fiscal policy. See, we need to understand inflation and what it really is. Okay. And I, I admit that inflation is pretty tame at the moment. But if you take out a 30 year mortgage, that’s at a fixed artificially low interest rate today, and you have that mortgage against commodities, that were the debt is outsource scible to somebody called a tenant. I mean, look, I don’t like debt if I have to pay it myself. But if I can outsource my debt to a tenant, this is a beautiful thing. And that’s why it’s such a great asset class, right. So to understand inflation, we need to distinguish between real and nominal real is the real value of something nominal just means a name only. And, and we need to distinguish between price and value. We need to understand that inflation is this insidious, hidden tax that destroys our purchasing power and our standard of living and we need to notice that inflation destroys the value of our savings, our stocks, our bonds, and thankfully, the value of our debt. This is the beauty of it. debt is my favorite four letter word when I don’t pay it myself, and when it’s against what I call packaged commodities. See, I’m a commodities investor. I invest in lumber, copper wire, petroleum products, labor, energy, concrete, glass and steel. And they’re always assembled in the form of a house or an apartment building. That’s my favorite investment. And I get 30 year artificially low fixed rate debt against those assets. So I’ve got the commodity hedge against inflation, and the debt being debased against inflation, while the tenant is actually paying the debt and I’m not I call this the double end. arbitrage now, inflation is the most powerful method of wealth redistribution ever known to man. It’s far more powerful than taxes. You may remember a long time ago a guy by the name of joe the plumber, right? Who asked candidate Obama Are you going to redistribute my wealth? Well, I had joe the plumber on my podcast, okay. And, and you know, he got sort of has his 15 minutes of fame from that line, but inflation is a much better way to redistribute wealth than taxation. because not many people notice that they all notice taxes immediately, but inflation is the slow burn, okay. And inflation redistributes wealth from lenders to borrowers. Because borrowers pay their debts back and cheaper dollars. Lenders loan them out in current dollars. So you you take advantage of this huge time value of money. opportunity. And it also redistributes wealth from old people to young people. Now, why does it do that? You might be thinking, well, old people generally have assets in the forms of savings, stocks and bonds. Well, young people generally have debt. So their debt is paid off through inflation. and old people suffer because the value of their assets is debased by inflation. See, because it’s all denominated in dollars or whatever currency is being inflated. Just a reminder, you’re listening to flashback Friday. Our new episodes are published every Monday and every Wednesday.
Yeah, so essentially, I mean, not to make it too obvious, but it just make sure it’s clear for the audience and stuff is that if you borrow $100,000 for our house in 2015, or 16, now, in each year, there’s inflation you’re paying, you’re still paying back the same fixed amount of hundred thousand dollars. But you’re paying it back with cheaper and cheaper dollars moving forward.
Jason Hartman 40:05
Absolutely. That’s beautiful. You explained it perfectly. And lest we think unless your listeners think that this is some abstract theory, let me put into into real terms here. Okay? And I’m going to share with you an example. Now there’s quite a few numbers here. So just pay attention. Okay, I’ll make it easy to follow. And I’ll be glad to give you a copy of this if you want to put it on your website for your listeners. But But basically, this happened to 10s of millions of people what I’m about to share, Okay, so here’s the example, in 1970 to one year after we went off the gold standard, okay, the median single family home was priced at 18. I’m gonna round off to make this fast. Okay, about $18,000. Okay, if you put 20% down on this property, and you lived in it, this is not an income property. This is just a home you lived in. Now if it was an income property, you would be dramatically better than this example. But it’s good enough without getting income. Okay? So so if you put 20% down, you would get alone a mortgage for about $14,000. The interest rate on a 30 year fixed rate mortgage in the middle of 1972 was 7.37%. Okay, so that’s what you start with in 1972 $1 was worth $1. But we had some inflation. We had the Jimmy Carter era, which was a disaster. And we had paul volcker, the only Fed chair, probably ever willing to make the economy take it’s tough medicine, which was tough, but he broke the back of inflation by doing that by raising rates and, you know, curtailing the money supply, which every other Fed chair has done the complete opposite, that, you know, their idea of putting out a fire is to throw gasoline on it if you’re if you’re, you know, Ben Bernanke and Janet Yellen or Alan green Bam. Okay, so let’s just fast forward 12 years now to a year that a famous book was written in 1984. Okay, the Orwellian era, right? So in 1984, that 19 $72 is now worth only 40 cents. And this is by official numbers. In reality, inflation is always higher than the official number the government gives us, but let’s just take the official number to be conservative. The examples actually much better than this in real inflation terms. So now that 19 $72 just in 12 short years has lost 60 cents of its value 60% has been debased or paid off by inflation, right. And every month for the last 12 years, owning this house, you’ve been making mortgage payments of $101 one on one per month. But as As the years went by that payment felt cheaper and cheaper to you. Because by 1984 the real value of that payment even though you were still writing a check for one on one per month was only $41 because of inflation paying down the the loan, Okay, now let’s fast forward to the very end of it. 30 year mortgage, this happened to 10s of millions of people. It’s not a theory, it actually happened. But most people thought they they got wealthy by owning their real estate because it went up in value. But what they didn’t usually realize is the debt went down in value. Okay, so they got this double inflation arbitrage as I call it. Now, in 2001. When you’re making the last payment on that mortgage, the value of the 19 $72 now only 24 cents. The payment when you’re writing that last check for $101 the feel value, the real value of it, what it feels Like it’s only $24 you know, it’s basically like buying lunch. Okay. And, and that’s the last payment. So let me summarize this. The mortgage, the money we borrowed was only $14,000. In nominal dollars, we repaid $36,000. But after inflation attacked those dollars and the base them and paid them down to the benefit of the owner of the property and the holder of the mortgage, the debt being a huge asset, not a liability, as most people think the real dollars that we repaid was just over $16,000 now it gets better. After tax benefits, the real inflation and tax adjusted dollars was only $12,000. But wait, you say Didn’t we borrow 14,000 and we only in real dollars paid back in real terms? 12,000 Yes, we thought we were paying 7.37% interest, but after inflation, our effective rate was only 1.06%. And after tax benefits, it was negative 1.16%. We got paid to borrow the money.
We got paid. And
Jason Hartman 45:18
I didn’t even mention that we lived there for three decades for free. We got free rent for 30 years and got paid. How does the free rent come in? Because I thought that your income property well, because it No, this is not an income property. If this were an income property, it would be dramatically better because see, we were making these payments ourselves. If we could outsource the debt to a tenant, and have them hopefully pay us a little extra every month called positive cash flow. This example would be like, infinitesimally better. Okay, but if I if I even did that example, if I did the math on it, no one would believe me
like, like lottery numbers better
you Yeah, it’d be insane.
Jason Hartman 46:01
Okay, it’d be like, you know, your return on investment was like 9,082% or something.
Okay, so I guess you’re saying they live there for free because they had to pay back less than they borrowed? Is that what it came down to? in real dollars? Yes.
Jason Hartman 46:13
And, and and just so you know, you know, there were there was some high inflation in there for a few years under Carter. But overall, the average inflation rate over the three decades was only 5.1%. It was modest. I mean, it wasn’t, you know, if this deal were in Zimbabwe or Spain or Mexico or Portugal or Brazil or Argentina or, you know, any of these countries that experienced very, very severe inflation, the why Mar Republic, you know, Germany for God’s sake, I mean, the returns would be insane.
Going by official numbers, even in a relatively lower inflation environment like we have today, the principle still holds it may not be quite as compelling but the principle is still there unless we fall into deflation, which
Jason Hartman 46:59
is It’s not as dramatic
of the central bank. So I think we’re probably on a safe end on that front. But no, that’s compelling. And I think that’s, it’s, it’s helpful to hear perspectives like that. Because, again, as you mentioned, real estate, it does involve more hands on, especially at maybe an, excuse me income properties, especially at an early, early level, because if you’re maybe a more deeper into income properties, you can, you know, hire management companies and have a little more hands off, I guess, in the process, but realizing that there are those benefits like that, and of course, you know, in the back of everyone’s mind, there’s gonna be that one story you heard over here about the tenant. Yeah, and you know, it was this this disastrous process, and then there’s there’s gonna be one story over here.
Jason Hartman 47:49
Yeah, yeah. I had to evict somebody, you know. Yeah.
Yeah. pipes. bursty
Jason Hartman 47:54
a repair issue or something. Yeah, sure. No, I know you’re out there. Hey, listen, I have them. Perfect. I’m I am by no means saying this is perfect. It has problems. But look, I’ll tell you, you never hear a story from any of your friends a cocktail party conversation of, Oh, yeah, I got a bunch of properties and my tenants pay rent every month, perfectly on time yet that is what happens
most of the time. And I’m extremely wealthy because of it. Yeah, no one says that.
Jason Hartman 48:20
Yeah, right. That’s what happens the vast majority of the time, you only hear the exception to that. Okay. You only hear the negative story. And
that’s my point. And that’s my point. Yeah. People we get scared off by the one or two stories, that very likely may not be indicative of reality. Yeah, absolutely. Absolutely. So
Jason Hartman 48:37
so you know, don’t let them scare you. And, you know, I just want to compliment you for having me on your show. Because, you know, this is not your thing. You’re interested and your audience is interested in investing in stocks. And you know, I’m the outlier here. So, you know, it really shows that you’re a journalist by having me on and showing another viewpoint, so I appreciate that. That’s, your listeners should appreciate it, too.
Yeah. Well, you’re very kind to say that Jason And yeah, I mean, our goal, ultimately is to become better investors period. I always love saying that every dollar we spend and every minute we spend is an investment in something and you want to make the best possible investments we can. And if that’s in equities great, and if it’s not, then we want to go there too. And I think, obviously, you said before we started the interview, you could talk for three days on this topic. And I don’t doubt that because I would like to keep picking your brain the topic, but I love
Jason Hartman 49:23
this stuff. I just love I absolutely love it. But But yeah, it’s great. I’d be glad to come back on, you know, there’s another whole principle that’s kind of a big, a big chunk. I call it the Hartman risk evaluator, it took me 19 years to discover this, of what really can dramatically reduce risk and an investment. You know, it didn’t take another half hour to go through that. But you know, maybe we can do it another time. It’s pretty interesting. But, you know, I just wanted to get this stuff out because I think it’d be interesting to your investors and, you know, we’ll we’ll see where it all goes. It’s it’s quite interesting. And I would say if you’re going to be in the stock market by dividend paying stocks.
Because, you know, you gotta have income.
Jason Hartman 50:03
In fact, I define, I say in the, in my podcast and in my seminars, I say anything without income does not qualify as an investment. It’s simply a speculation. So they can land, that’s real estate, but it’s it’s a speculation, it’s a gamble. It’s not an investment. In order to have an investment to use that term. You have to have income, without income, you know, if you if you buy gold, or silver and you level this, I own all this stuff, too. Okay, I own everything pretty much, you know, except I don’t own any stocks anymore, okay, or mutual funds, but I used to own a bunch. If you buy precious metals, you know, they don’t produce any income. That’s a speculative deal. You know, it’s gambling. And so you Listen, I’ve won a lot of times gambling, okay. So I freely admit that but I’m just saying, The older I get, the more conservative I get, and I just want things I I like mailbox money. I just like getting income every month. I like my tenants paying off my loans.
No, I mean, that’s a good word. I think the more I grow as an investor with experience and otherwise, you know, it’s the one of those age old investing truisms that usually, usually the more boring the investment, the better the investment is. So, yeah, you know, because you think it’s so easy to get in that mindset of, especially when you’re looking at something that you hope will have quick appreciation or significant appreciation. That’s exciting. But it’s almost it’s very rare that an exciting investment doesn’t have usually an equal amount of risk involved to and so that
Jason Hartman 51:39
Yeah, they are the more simple and boring I agree.
Yeah, sure. Well, and over time,
Jason Hartman 51:45
this this what you’re talking about is so true, because there is nothing sexy about my investments except the returns. You know, it’s a difference. It’s a difference between having a wife and a mistress.
What is Exciting,
Jason Hartman 52:00
but really scary. And the other is dependable.
Yeah. And if and if you measure if you get caught up measuring things in months versus measuring in years and decades, that’s the difference. It’s when you can think in years and decades. That is where you’re positioning yourself for great success in my mind. And that’s, that’s definitely the game with real estate and the local real estate mentor that I’ve been working with. And you know, he’s talked about, you know, everyone wants to say, Well, I’m not quite ready for real estate, I’m not quite ready to do this. But the thing is, it’s the, it’s one of those where you, you don’t want to wait to buy you want to buy and then wait, because you let that tenant pay off that mortgage. And then it’s like, send mailbox money and all you’re dealing with is, you know, taxes or whatever else. But, Jason again, I want to respect your time. Like I said, I could pepper you with questions for the rest of the day, and I know you could, you could offer great stuff that entire time but you’ve got a lot on your plate right now. We want to wish you the best with your upcoming conference. And we look forward to hopefully connecting with you again sometime and also getting some of those
PowerPoints you mentioned to give their audience that’d be a real help. And
Jason Hartman 53:05
yeah, I’ll email those over to you. So you can put them on your website. And if they have questions for me, My website is Jason Hartman, calm. It’s just my name, Jason Hartman, h AR t ma n COMM And then of course, podcast is on iTunes and all the usual places.
Yeah. And we’ll be sure to link to all those things from our website to make sure our guests and listeners can find you as well. And hey, Jason, thanks for coming on the show. And we wish you all the best.
Jason Hartman 53:29
Hey, thanks for having me and happy investing to you and your listeners.
I’ve never really thought of Jason as subversive. But I just found out that’s what Wall Street considers him to be.
Really now How is that possible at all?
Simple. Wall Street believes that real estate investors are dangerous to their schemes? Because the dirty truth about income property is that it actually works in real life. I know I mean, how many people do you know
not including insiders who created wealth with stocks, bonds, And mutual funds. those options are for people who only want to pretend they’re getting ahead.
Stocks and other non direct traded assets are losing game for most people. The typical scenario is you make a little you lose a little and spin your wheels for decades.
That’s because the corporate crooks running the stock and bond investing game we’ll always see to it that they win. This means unless you’re one of them, you will not win.
And unluckily for wall street. Jason has a unique ability to make the everyday person understand investing the way it should be. He shows them a world where anything less than a 26% annual return is disappointing.
Yep. And that’s why Jason offers a one book set on creating wealth that comes with 20 digital download audios. He shows us how we can be excited about these scary times and exploit the incredible opportunities this present economy has afforded us.
We can pick local markets untouched by the economic downturn. It exploit packaged commodities investing and achieve exceptional returns safely and securely.
I like how he teaches you how to protect the equity in your home before it disappears and how to outsource your debt obligations to the government.
And this set of advanced strategies for wealth creation is being offered for only $197 to get your creating wealth encyclopedia book one complete with over 20 hours of audio, go to Jason Hartman comm forward slash store.
If you want to be able to sit back and collect checks every month, just like a banker. Jason’s creating wealth encyclopedia series is for you. This show is produced by the Hartman media company All rights reserved for distribution or publication rights and media interviews, please visit www dot Hartman media.com or email media at Hartman media COMM nothing on this show should be considered specific personal or professional advice. Please consult an appropriate tax legal real estate or business professional for individualized advice. opinions of guests are their own. And the host is acting on behalf of Platinum properties, investor network, Inc. exclusively.