On this Flashback Friday episode, Jason Hartman talks to Harry S. Dent, Jr. Harry is an American financial newsletter writer and author of The Great Depression Ahead. They talk about Harry’s company which reviews the economy in the US and around the world by focusing on generational consumer spending patterns, as well as financial markets.

Announcer  0:00
This show is produced by the Hartman media company. For more information and links to all our great podcasts visit Hartman media.com.

Announcer 0:09
Welcome to the flashback Friday edition of the creating wealth show with Jason Hartman. As he rapidly approaches 1000 episodes of this podcast, he has hand picked individual episodes that he feels is going to be good review for you to prepare you for the future by listening to the past. Let’s dive in.

Announcer 0:29
Welcome to the creating wealth show with Jason Hartman. You’re about to learn a new slant on investing some exciting techniques and fresh new approaches to the world’s most historically proven asset class that will enable you to create more wealth and freedom than you ever thought possible. Jason is a genuine self made multi millionaire who’s actually been there and done it. He’s a successful investor, lender, developer and entrepreneur who’s owned properties in 11 states had hundreds of tenants Get involved in thousands of real estate transactions. This program will help you follow in Jason’s footsteps on the road to your financial independence day. You really can do it. And now here’s your host, Jason Hartman with the complete solution for real estate investors

Jason Hartman 1:19
It is my honor and pleasure to welcome Harry dent to the show. Harry, it’s good to have you on.

Harry Dent 1:21
Nice to be here, Jason.

Jason Hartman 1:23
Good. Well tell us a little bit about what you do. You’ve written several books, many of them hot selling books, and give us a little background on your company.

Harry Dent 1:33
Well, you know, I really got into forecasting in the late 80s, after working in business consulting first at Bain and company with large companies and then with new ventures and small companies in California. And I just, you know, started realizing that the baby boom, this new generation was driving all these trends and just kept doing more research and of the new technologies emerging and this generation and, you know, kind of came up with a whole new way of approaching economics we look at demographic cycles and other Words that predictable things people do as they age. And of course, people kind of come in large generational surges, like the baby boomer generation. And so as the baby boomers been aging and you know, getting married and having families and buying houses, we’ve seen a boom. And we started realizing in the late 80s, when we first got some of our key indicators that, you know, a lot of people were calling for depression in the 1990s, on a famous, you know, contrada for kind of 5560 year cycle. And we were saying, No, no, the 90s is going to see the greatest boom in history because the baby boomers are going to be in their strongest period of productivity and spending. And then that boom was going to continue into this decade, and we would see a depression of an extended downturn from late in this decade, into the next decade and beyond. We also predicted the Japanese slowdown in the early days. So again, we took indicators that economists do not even look at and say, Oh my gosh, these things the long term is very predictive. You know, economists have it backwards. It’s the short term that’s difficult this, this recent crash and stocks kind of kind of, even though we were expecting it sooner or later kind of came out of nowhere and and all those hidden off balance sheet stuff and all and it kind of like Enron, but you know, the short term stuff, you can get huge curveballs, but long term trends are very predictable. Every 40 years, we’ve seen generations peak in their spending, and you get long term tops and stocks like 1929 1968. And now you know, between 2007 2009 and, and commodities are similar to it’s a different clock, and it’s it’s more of a technology cycle, but commodities have peak every 29 to 30 years and 1920 1951 1980. And now we think we’re due for some sort of peak higher. We don’t think the commodity booms over yet, probably around late 2009, early 2010. So we start with fundamentals, technology cycles, and the which go through very clear stages and affect our economy. We look at demographic cycles of spending, investment, borrowing all that sort of stuff and down to micro areas like potato chips if need be. And then we look at cycles that repeat like this commodity cycle, and then like this four year cycle in stocks, and the Decennial cycle and things like that. And then finally, in the short term on our newsletter, you know, we looked at, you know, just like any technical analysts would be, you know, how bullish or bearish are people, and that sort of thing, you know, whether the markets are likely to be going up or down short term, because the short term really doesn’t have as much to do with fundamentals. So we say in the long term, the fundamentals are everything, and they’re actually pretty darn easy to measure in project. And in the short term, the technical indicators, you know, how bullish and bearish and crazy people are, makes more difference. I mean, we’ve got panic hedge funds selling on winding all their leverage in bad moves, and that’s just causing a short term meltdown that doesn’t have that much to do with the economy.

Jason Hartman 4:59
Remember, You’re listening to flashback Friday. Our new episodes are published every Monday and Wednesday. I agree with you, I kind of differentiate that by saying there’s the virtual economy or the wall street or the financial economy. And then there’s the real economy, you know, you and I are trading and and there’s a difference that seemed to be distinct elements. And as you see these hedge funds on wind and the leverage, you’re seeing a lot of artificial downward pressure on various commodities out there and various assets. I believe. One of the things I love about your work since I discovered in the 90s is how it seems to be pretty simple, at least the way you put it has simplified it so much for me, you know, you name the peak earning years I think you say about age 46 or this peak spending years. Do you want to go into that for us and it seems so easy to follow demographics, you know,

Harry Dent 5:54
the demographics is simple. I mean, we have a lot of indicators and putting them together can be complex to some degree but yeah, the indicators themselves are very simple. Yes, people enter the workforce at age 20 and a half today on average and apart from high school or from college, and they grow up in an earn and spend more money until a plateau between 46 and 50. So all we do is take the birth index adjusted for immigration past and future forecast forecasts, you know, move that forward 48 years for the average peak and spending and boom, that economy grows with that you’ve got a 50 year leading indicator, the economy grows with that the stock market adjusted for inflation generally follows that I mean, it’s an incredible indicator, and and allow our indicators, because there’s simple number one and two, because you can project them well into the future. They allow people to plan for the rest of their lifetime, not just till the next election, I agree with you is a whole different approach. Again, economists hate people like us because they say that not possible in the world is too complex and is changing too fast. But you know, the more complex the world gets, the smarter we get, and the better our information and all we Throughout all of human history is is understand more processes and make things predictable, like the seasons and farming and all this stuff. I mean, and now we’re saying, gosh, you you can literally see the major trends in inflation and deflation spending, you know, investing different countries around the world, different regions in the country, you know, decades in advance.

Jason Hartman 7:21
Well, I agree with you. And that’s one of the things that’s interesting about your work. It seems reasonably predictable to look at macro trends in the United States. But the thing I don’t know, you know, I know that in the US we’ve, of course, got the baby boomers at 76 million person cohort, we’ve got the Gen Y or millennialist. That’s about 80 million of even a bigger cohort, I believe, by a little bit. And so they’re entering the workforce. Now the baby boomers are starting to think about cashing out and get out of the workforce or at least downgrade their spending start cashing out their retirement plans and so forth. But what are the different cohorts around the world because the economies are so coupled And interconnected nowadays. I’ve never heard you address that thought. And I was wondering what you think about it?

Harry Dent 8:06
Well, we are we are gonna address that much more in our book that’s coming out late December, January, we have an entire chapter that looks at the spending waves we call it the same concept moving forward, the birth index are the age distribution for when people will spend the most money. And it’s very different around the world what we’re we’re about to see a very major divide or pivot point here, where the Western nations like Europe and North America and Australia, New Zealand, and Japan, to a lesser degree that really driven the world economy so much for decades and centuries are literally starting to age and slow down that the millennial generation here is the first generation actually that their birth levels only came back up close to the birth levels of the baby boom. In other words, it’s not a bigger generation. It doesn’t take us to new heights. Our country is going to more like plants. For many decades, Europe doesn’t even have an eco boom generation which means after 2010 they decline as far as the eye can see.

Jason Hartman 9:08
And they’ve got a big legacy problem because they haven’t replaced the younger workers. So

Harry Dent 9:12
now is exactly they don’t have young people and without young people you die. I mean, we take Europe if you look demographically is kind of like a person going into retirement Europe is retiring, country low and contract. The United States is more like at its peak, like in his 40s and 50s. Still at the crest of it’s, you know, still healthy and strong and you know, wealthy but but not going to grow like it did in the past. And you’ve got these new Asian economies that are the new 20 somethings and 30 somethings, I mean, China, China surprisingly, has strong growth into about 2015 to 20. But then they they’ve

Jason Hartman 9:45
got a demographic problem,

Harry Dent 9:47
they have a demographic problem because they stopped having kids by by law right in the early 70s. So see an art theory that hits you about 50 years later, 46 to 50 years later, India. If I had if I had to place my On one country going in the future, you know, for an investment for my kids at the India, India has demographics, as long as they don’t screw it up to grow into the 2000 and 60s, you know, for, you know, five or six decades ahead. Many countries in Southeast Asia grow to 2040 5060s. You know, some Middle Eastern countries are further out than that. Most of Latin America grows for many decades. So we really aren’t going to switch from the developed world to the emerging world after this boom, you know, because people have been saying, Oh, it’s gonna be Asia’s decade over Asia century. But hey, we’ve been growing rapidly to with this big internet boom and as giant baby boom generation, but the West really does slow down. And the United States is in a much better position primarily for the thing that most people criticize our immigration, our immigration has kept us younger, and the immigrants are having more kids. And so we actually do have a it’s not a bigger regeneration. But we have Elisa generation to kind of like, replace us an elite least let us plateau for the coming decades and then have another boom. It’s really grim. If you look at Russia, East Europe and Europe going forward and not too far down the road, China and Japan are the real aging nations. Yeah,

Jason Hartman 11:16
I mean, Russia is really a dying nation, even though they’re prosperous now, but they they really have a huge demographic bubble and Russia. On the Europe question. Is there a distinction between Eastern and Western Europe as far as the demographic bubble because I know the Western Europe is really a retiring region. But what about Eastern is that different at all?

Harry Dent 11:36
Eastern Europe booms a little longer, some apa 2015 or 20, but then decline sharply, Southern Europe, Spain booms and has growing demographics into 2020 and Italy into 2015. And Greece, but then they really drop off Southern Europe actually is the worst. And then well, Russia is the worst and then Southern Europe and then probably east. Europe, and then West Europe and in Northern Europe is the best. The biggest surprise is the people in Scandinavia, Norway, Denmark, Sweden, and all that

Jason Hartman 12:08
very well. They have

Harry Dent 12:09
very high women workforce participation and very strong support for them. So they’re, they’re women still have a reasonable amount of children not enough to replace themselves. I mean, they’re gonna slowly slow down, but not as much as the rest of Europe. So they’re, they’re kind of the best position. The Great Britain, Denmark and Scandinavia are the best position in Europe.

Jason Hartman 12:31
Now very interesting. Well tell us more about the dent method. And what are you looking at tell us these peak spending and peak earning years I think those are great little simple barometers there.

Harry Dent 12:40
What are the peak the peak spending comes between 46 and 50? It’s kind of like a double peak. And then people spend less the rest of life and then of course, there’s a reason for this whole cycle tends to revolve around kids. We entered the workforce around age 20 you know, some people 18 some 22 we get married at age 26. Some people earlier some people Depending on whether you went to college or not, then we have kids in our late 20s, early 30s. And then by the time we hit 46 to 50, our kids are either getting out of high school and going the workforce, or they’re getting out of college going to workforce. So they leave the nest between 46 and 50. And once they leave the nest, not only do you not need a bigger house, and in fact, you bought your house many years before when they were in high school, but you don’t need you don’t buy a car as often because you’re not driving them around a soccer practice. You don’t need as much food and refrigerator, you don’t have as much car insurance on and on and on. So people naturally save more for retirement and spend less now, saving is a good thing for the individual. But for the economy, you get a whole generation like Japan in the 90s just all of a sudden shift from spending more to saving more and spending less well you get an endless recession. And that’s what Japan had. I mean, we did predict that downturn in the late 80s. Not only because they had an unbelievable real estate bubble and stock bubble somewhere the United States today Because they were coming on on demographic slowdown two decades before the United States and Europe. So one of the great things when people say, well, what’s this going to look like this slowdown we’re doing? I said, Well, first of all, you can look at Japan, they’ve already been through it. And you know what real estate went down 60 to 70%. In Tokyo, over many years, the stock market went down 80% even though the rest of the world was booming so and their government tried to stimulate the economy they had extremely low interest rates. You know what you ended up being more on the deflationary side anyway, because the government was pushing on a string old people don’t need to acquire durable goods and they don’t need to borrow money, they pay down debt. They save and they don’t spend, they particularly don’t buy durable goods like cars and houses and things like that. So that you know, these demographic cycles are very clear this people do stuff at predictable ages. We can tell you when they have the highest mortgage, you know, age 41 to 42 when they invest The most money in stocks and overall and age 54 when they have the highest net worth at age 64. You know, anything you want to know when they buy potato chips 42 when their kids are the peak of their calorie intake at age 14, you know, I mean, it’s a science it’s like economics where people are guessing what the government is going to do and what is the dollar is going to go up and down and all this crazy stuff. It’s a science that says, people I mean, this is as predictable as life insurance actuaries predicting when you’re going to die.

Jason Hartman 15:30
Just a reminder, you’re listening to flashback Friday, our new episodes are published every Monday, every Wednesday. Very interesting stuff. What is the peak earnings year? What age is that? Is that 46 as well?

Harry Dent 15:45
It’s similar. Yeah, in the late 40s. Earnings actually may peak a little bit later, or a little bit higher, say more like 50 and then 46 to 50 as people start to save a little bit, but yeah, it’s a similar time and then earnings goes down as well, people don’t just save and spend less, but earnings goes down. One of the first things that happens for a certain percentage of households is women who’ve been working to get the kids through school and college and support the household say, okay, I’ve had enough, you know, and women start to leave the workforce quicker than men after age 50. So that’s one of the reasons that earnings goes down. And another reasons people probably work less overtime and work less hard and advance less fast. But I mean, regardless of the reasons, you know, the statistics are clear, people earn and spend more money into age 46 to 50. And they spend, earn and spend less the rest of their life.

Jason Hartman 16:35
Very good. So what about the issue of inflation? If you’ve got a large segment of the population in their mid 40s? Is that going to create more inflation because there are more people consuming, more people earning, there’s just more wealth in the system. And when were we at that mid 40s, the biggest segment of the population, the mid 40s, was that and then 90s

Harry Dent 17:00
No, no, no, we’re we’re at that. Now we’re at that now the peak comes at the crest of boom. And you know, it’s actually it’s counterintuitive, but it’s the opposite. All right, young people are inflationary. Think about this from it. I mean that we get simpler than this. Young people cost everything and produce nothing.

Jason Hartman 17:15
Right? I read that in one of your papers. Yeah,

Harry Dent 17:18
okay, they inflationary parents have to invest a quarter million dollars to raise the average kid not counting college, the government has to make major expenditures on the education system and all these services and stuff. And businesses have to build offices form and equip them with new technology and train them for the first couple of years they come in before they become productive. So when people are reaching their mid to late 40s, and not only just earning and staying the most, they’re the most productive, they will be as workers and productivity is disinflationary brings inflation down. So the reason we had the highest inflation rates in US history, and remember, oil prices were 40 bucks in 1980 and $147 earlier this year, and we had inflation of you know, Maybe four or five 6% this year and back then it was 1415 16% mortgage rates were off the roof. It’s because this massive baby boom generation was entering the workforce. So we have an indicator like our spending wave is called the inflation indicator. And it’s a two and a half year lag on workforce growth when more young people are entering the workforce that tends to be inflationary. Well, we had the highest amount of that in the late 70s, with the highest inflation rates, and then what’s going to happen here ahead, and this is also kind of counterintuitive, but baby boomers are going to since there’s a larger generation relatively, they’re going to start to retire in the next decade faster than the echo boom enters the workforce, and that when the workforce contracts or slows, that is deeply visionary. So this indicator, which we see that spending way, we came up in 1988 1989 inflation indicator. This thing tracks inflation better than I would have expected. I mean, even on a short term basis, it catches most of the wiggles and it says We’re going to have inflation pressures into 2009, early 2010, from the the kind of boom growing workforce into late 2007, before the slowdown started and then we’re going to switch to deflationary trends from 2010 onwards. Again, we can go two and a half years on this indicator, but we can also go past that and predict Well, we know that people enter on average at age 20 to 21. And we know they exit on average at age 63. So we can project those trends in the future and it actually projects deflation. Now that differences, disinflation means a lower rate of inflation. So since the peak of inflation, I think at about 16%, in 1980, we went down to very low inflation, say about one to 2% in the late 90s. And now we’ve come back up to three, four or five 6% here recently, because echo boomers have been entering the workforce a little faster, then we will eventually go down and see prices fall, deflation is when prices actually fall. And the only time we’ve seen that was in the 1930s the only time In any of our lifetimes, and certainly not in my lifetime, it was 80 years ago. And we’re saying the same thing is going to happen again, it, it appears that the government’s going to inflate their way out of this, which they’re going to try. And we’re going to get inflation, we think first, but eventually, when the economy slows down, you have to write up all these real estate loans and real estate goes down 50% instead of 20%. The contraction of loans in the banking system will destroy way more money because it’s so leveraged 10 to one than any stimulus the government can put in and you end up with deflation in the end. So that’s a that’s a mind blower and it’s a contrary forecast. We think we’re going to have inflation in the late 2009, early 2010. If we get any type of recovery from the stimulus plan, and then the government’s not gonna be able to keep stimulating and inflating because inflation becomes the problem. And then the economy finally goes down because baby boomers are on a real downslide in spending and the government’s can’t do anything about it and then they blown all their ammunition anyway and we go into a deflationary downturn like the early 30s So you can imagine there’s a lot of threats there and a lot of opportunity to understand something like that’s gonna happen. Right. So

Jason Hartman 21:07
I agree with you in part. But here’s the big part that I’m not sure I agree with you on. We’ve got this global economy, and we’ve got, you know, two and a half billion people that are playing in the game that just they weren’t playing 20 years ago. So what do you say about the consumption from China, India, Latin America? I mean, there’s a lot of consumption, and that is, it’s inflationary, I would say, but there’s production with it. So when you look at it through the dense glasses, I’m not sure what you think about that. But you know, the Fed here has really realized that they just don’t have control over the global economy. If it were 2030 years ago, you know, the Fed would do something and the US would react and it would change things dramatically. And they’ve used almost all of their ammo. Their last bullet in the gun is a 1% or 100 basis point, decline in the Fed rate and so You know, they’re almost out of bullets. I mean, they can’t do it because they don’t control the rest of the world now, they’re doing things like coordinating rate cuts and opening more discount windows and credit facilities, but it just doesn’t seem to be doing the trick. So what do you think about the global consumption issue that wasn’t a visible?

Harry Dent 22:21
global consumption is great for them. But But people don’t realize and this is just a fact. We export only 3% of our GDP to all of Asia. So Asia could be growing at 20% a year. But if we’re imploding and we’re slowing, our economy’s still gonna slow and Japan went through the same thing. Japan had an endless recession, and mild deflation, even with the rest of the world booming on an unprecedented scale across the board in 1990. Everybody was booming in the 1990s, except for Japan. So that’s one example where a country went through deflation anyway. And the fact that our economies are coupled, but they’re not that coupled, right? Sell that much to Asia. The second thing is they are these emerging countries in the early stages, and it was true of our country to 100 years ago, are more dependent on commodity prices, it’s more part of the equation India spends 60% of its budget on commodities and foods and China 40% we only spend about 10% of our economy. So these commodity cycles are very important for their inflation rates. And we show the commodities are due to peak around 2009 or 10. And decline for a decade or so before they come back. So there’s a lot of factors but

Jason Hartman 23:34
and when you say commodities, can you parse that up for us? Are there any specific commodities to what you’re referring or are you making a broad stroke they’re

Harry Dent 23:42
probably they do tend to peak together at night and in the last major peaks like in 1920, major commodity peak 1980 1951. These different commodities, agricultural commodities, industrial metals, precious metals, energy, oil, all peaked within about a year of each other. So they do tend to run in similar cycles. And right now we would be the most bullish looking head. But we think a huge Buying Opportunity is coming here and in oil and energy. If oil hits close to $50, we think oil could go back to its highs or even make a new high $180 in the next year and a half. And that would outstrip anything any stock market could do and gold will probably at least double gold is a hedge against both inflation and monetary meltdown and oil as a great hedge against terrorism and that sort of risks. So those are the two commodities. I think, you know, any rebound on the economy will be good for the whole commodity spectrum, but I think it would particularly be strong and energy and precious metals.

Jason Hartman 24:46
Okay, so back to the precious metals thing, you know, on the gold issue. I’m a bit of a gold bug and I generally agree with gold bugs as far as their premise, I just don’t agree with their conclusion. And the reason I don’t because it all makes so much sense. You know, gold should be $2,000 an ounce right now in my opinion. But the problem is it’s manipulated by all the central banks that keeps selling it off to suppress the price. They traded amongst each other, and those transactions are recorded, and they suppress the price artificially because they want to pump up their fiat currencies. I can’t see any other thing than that is there’s just a lot of manipulation in the gold market and all precious metals for that matter. I mean, silver, certainly to I don’t know if you’ve studied that, or what your thoughts are on it, but

Harry Dent 25:31
I don’t get in that level. But again, we do look at cycles and you know, gold did peak in 1980 $800, near $800 an ounce and it was projected to go to 5000. And next thing, you know, years down the road, it’s at 200 something and oil peaked at 40. And it’s projected to go to 100. And next thing you know, in 1986, it’s $11. So these commodity cycles are among the most volatile and yes, they can be manipulated and everything else but you know, if I had to put my money in one place Hear near term, I think stocks are probably going to fall one more time, maybe down to a stronger support around 7007 200 in the next few weeks, a few months. But I think ultimately they’ll bounce in the next year with this recovery, maybe 2030 40%. But I would really rather have my money in places like gold and energy, right in a world right now. Because the bounces, there could be doubles or triples.

Jason Hartman 26:25
Thank you for listening to the creating wealth show. This is Jason Hartman, your host, and we appreciate you following the show. We have many, many episodes, hundreds of episodes, and some of the older episodes have been archived and placed in our members section. And that applies to this one. So we include a sample that’s about 25 minutes long, and then for the rest of the show, you can go to our members section at Jason hartman.com. Many of the other shows are still in their full length complete version. However, some of the shows like this one are in our members section where you can hear the show in its entirety. And again, you just need to go to Jason hartman.com. And you can get the full show there in the members section plus a whole bunch of other great members benefits and resources, whether it be documents, forms, contracts, articles, other video and audio content, just a great resource, so be sure to join as a member at Jason hartman.com. And thanks again for listening to the creating wealth show.

Thank you so much for listening. Please be sure to subscribe so that you don’t miss any episodes. Be sure to check out the show’s specific website and our general website Hartman Mediacom for appropriate disclaimers and Terms of Service. Remember that guest opinions are their own. And if you require specific legal or tax advice, or advice and any other specialized area, please consult an appropriate Professional, and we also very much appreciate you reviewing the show. Please go to iTunes or Stitcher Radio or whatever platform you’re using and write a review for the show we would very much appreciate that. And be sure to make it official and subscribe so you do not miss any episodes. We look forward to seeing you on the next episode.